We have received our first report back from our architects Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huber, Inc. (FTC&H).The report is almost 30 pages, so it is to large for a blog, but I can pass on their summary.
The existing City of Davison Municipal Building and Library were modern,
state of the art buildings in the late 1960’s and have served the community
well. However, it is our opinion that the buildings have exceeded their useful
life. The goals for the proposed Municipal Building and the current and
future space needs of the City cannot be met by the buildings in their current
condition or size.
The buildings are both in poor condition and do not effectively meet
the needs of the City. The flat roof design and extensive use of wood trim and
windows are a continuous maintenance issue and a drain on City resources. Due to
age, water damage, un-insulated windows and lack of insulation, the buildings do
not comply with the energy code and are relatively expensive to heat and cool.
Water penetration into the building and existing building materials may pose a
health risk.
Ramps and other features have been added to make the buildings
compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act. However, there are numerous
building elements that do not comply with this federal law and would be
difficult and expensive to change, including the restrooms, corridor widths and
access to Council Chambers.
The existing electrical service is inadequate to meet the needs of
modern technology, computers and other equipment required in either building.
The mechanical systems are undersized, high maintenance and impossible to modify
or expand. These systems need to be replaced.
The exterior and interior design presents a drab, uninviting image of City services. Neither of the buildings is large enough to meet current or future space requirements. This prevents staff from effectively performing their duties and serving the public.
In addition, the lack of space, the poor interior layout, and lack of a secure
separation between the Court / Police functions and City Hall create a public
and staff safety issue.
The structural design of each existing building, which includes exterior masonry bearing walls and interior steel columns and beams, will be
difficult and expensive to modify. The existing buildings are not large
enough to meet the current and future space needs of the City. If City services
are to remain on this site, the City has two choices to provide adequate space.
An addition could be constructed that connects the two existing buildings and
increases the size to meet the requirements of the updated building program, or
a new Municipal Building could be constructed on the site.
Given the condition, age and limitations of the existing buildings, it
is our opinion that the City should construct a new Municipal Building on the
site.
Several years ago when this became an issue brought to city council by citizens city council had the thought to add on to our existing structure (fill in the court yard or build on second stories to existing buildings). We had three architectural firms do a walk through of our buildings and give us their opinion. All three firms (FTC&H was not one of them) came to similar conclusions of what FTC&H has just informed us.
Our current city council was very animate that we explore this option before moving on.