How come it takes so long to develop a municipal center? Why don’t you just go for a millage and do a design build concept, I hear it’s a lot cheaper? Let the court system build their own building, and let the library go somewhere else (then theoretically we would have enough space for city hall and the police department without building anything new).
The first two are great questions I have received by different people. Both questions play into our process of developing the new municipal center. The other comments that I have heard from multiple sources make sense on the surface, but city council has looked beyond the surface to find that it is not the best scenario for our community.
I would like to address the first two questions as one issue and show a comparison in government action.
What we are doing is program driven. We are looking at functions, efficiencies, and long term impact to develop a successful operation. This has been a good process and is not yet completed, but getting closer every day.
We have looked at functions and services provided and developed a building that could house at least five different businesses in the most efficient way (Police, Library, Museum, District Court, and City Hall). From the beginning all of the entities were informed that as a part of this process, we were looking to share any common space that we could. We were not looking to have a lot of duplicated space.
From this process we are developing a building that not only fits the operational needs to provide our community with the services that the public wants, but is also efficient to operate and maintain well into the future.
As this plan has solidified, we have begun to explain the process and the results. This information will remain public and city council wants the citizens of the City of Davison to vote on the project.
This is why this process is program driven. We have developed a program. People who want to know about it can find out information of what they are voting for. This is in comparison to the dollar driven model that some agencies use.
Here in Genesee County the best dollar driven model that I can think of that is currently on the radar is the .07 Senior Citizens Millage that was just passed by a wide margin of county voters. This tax levy will generate over seven million dollars per year for “seniors”. Did I mention this passed overwhelmingly in the county?
Since being voted in last year you should see the frenzy across the county to get their hands on this “free money”. There was not a plan in place on how this money would be spent. There were several different stories on how it would be redistributed, but none of them have come to fruition yet. This is the dollar driven model. We need about this much money to provide XYZ.
In our view, we would rather do the leg work up front and then explain what our program is and not just ask the people to give us $$$.
How much are our taxes going to go up? We don’t have the answer to that yet, but are getting closer. Our goal is to not raise taxes for this project, but in reality we do not know if that is possible. In the last five years we have been able to lower the city millage rate by 3 mills.
Yes, we are currently asking for 1.35 mills to help pay for the Federal and State mandate Inflow/Infiltration project.
We have found a long term financial mechanism to help save money with a 4% interest rate over 40 years. Now we have to break down cost per function in the building and see what the impact will be for the city tax payers.
I know this is a longer blog than my normal, but the impact on tax payers answers the other statements about letting the court and library go build somewhere else. Each of those entities would not add tax value to the city (they don’t pay property tax). So, by taking more parcels off the tax roll (the property they buy and build on) this adds to the financial burden of the existing tax payers. Therefore, it does make economic sense to build together , on a parcel that is already off of the tax roll.

