The Davison Index reported in a news article that “The Davison Index placed calls to City Manager Pete Auger and the city’s attorney, Ridley Nimmo, to seek clarification of the charter, but they failed to respond prior to the Index production deadline Tuesday.”
This is factually incorrect. I responded to Ms. Dufour’s inquiry about the term “defaulter” the day she asked me. In regards to the section of the City Charter referring to a defaulter and holding public office, Ms. Dufour was informed that I meet with the city attorney(s) on Tuesday afternoon and she should call me then and I could probably have the clarification she was looking for. Ms. Dufour did not call me Tuesday afternoon to get our attorney’s response. I do not know why she did not want to know that according to the Michigan Attorney Generals (AG) opinion a defaulter is not someone who is behind or late in paying their taxes. But, if Ms. Dufour or the Davison Index had a deadline that they had to meet or wanted to confirm what a defaulter is according to election law at a quicker pace than we could respond they could have paid their crack legal team to do the research. Come to find out, this AG’s opinion has been around since 1936. Our City charter was rewritten and voted on by the electors of the city in 1999.
In defense of Ms. Dufour, this may be another one of those times when the editor and or publisher changed her story, or put an inflammatory headline on one of her stories that gets presented. I will not know that until a later date, because in the past, that is when Ms. Dufour comes to my office crying and apologizing for what was printed.
The Davison Editorial staff is also misinformed when it states “Owing money to the city is not allowed for those who would lead the city.”
The editorial staff continues on its normal rant about “And make no mistake — issues raised by city government actions in recent months can be boiled down to a matter of trust.” This is on the heels of the continual whine from the Editor that he (and his staff) is too busy to cover city meetings. More than one person has made the connection that this paper has stated they don’t cover all the local government meetings and almost in the same breath complain about poor communications.
Running a local government, in Michigan, is not easy, but it is hardly ever boring. We live in a democratically elected representative government. Therefore, it should not be that odd that our sitting, or some future sitting council, represent the population that elects it. Understanding this fact would put in perspective the above mentioned AG’s opinion. Sometimes people don’t pay their taxes on time. Okay, if you can’t pay them on time there are extra fees that you owe when you pay them.
I have had the pleasure to serve under two Mayors while in Davison. Both these people have the same passion for the city, but disagree on different topics and strategies, this is okay. On former Council’s, I have spent much time defending the dissenters on the city council. This is a basic component of representative government. Each elected official gets one vote (including the Mayor). That means that on a normal issue there needs to be 4 votes in order for the City Council to set or change policy. Sometimes that vote is 4 to 3, sometimes 6 to 1 and still other issues get a 5 to 2 vote. Theses votes can go for or against an issue. But, in a representative government a policy is set and all are represented. Sometimes we are represented by the 1 vote in a 6-1 vote, but we are represented.
There are even some issues that are brought up and never even get put to a vote.
With that in mind, there are probably a few people out there that pay their taxes late (for whatever reason) and our system of government says they get to be represented too.
Now as City Manager (and I have instructed our staff) we don’t get involved in or endorse any candidate for elected office because it is our job to implement the policies set down by the elected body. Since The Davison Index editorial waited until the “11th hour” (their words) to run this issue I think the finger of mistrust points at the ownership/publisher and paid/non paid editorial staff. People have since contacted me (citizens and elected {not the three running for Mayor mentioned by the Index}) and have asked why The Davison Index would want to “taint” a local election.
I do not know, or pretend to know why people choose to behave or act in a certain manor, nor do I know if there is an attempt by The Davison Index to “taint” the election. But, in dealing with ethical issues I am aware that where there is a partnership or an appearance of such that disclosure is the norm for most reputable people. It may only be a coincidence, but the person singled out to be the next Mayor by the Davison Index was in a/or attempted to form a partnership in an endeavor with the publisher and his wife as a plaintiff against the city and its residents.
That is ok and legal as far as we know, but with great power (owning and printing a “news” paper) comes great responsibility. The “press” in our country is often referred to as the 4th branch of government (Legislative, Judicial and Executive are the three other official branches). People refer to this because normally the press reports on what governments do. Who keeps a watch on the press? Other Press outlets?
Normally, if there is an investigation about a local official, our local law enforcement does not investigate the issue. We pass it on to another law enforcement agency (County Sheriff or State Police). When The Davison Index reports as news and editorially on factually incorrect items, in their last publication before the election (no time for retraction or correction, coincidently I am sure) and this could have an effect on a local election, who investigates or sets the record straight? For all of those who have asked, I am sorry, I do not have an answer to this.
Sometimes newly elected people find it frustrating that they run for office on one or two issues and find out that it is tough to make decisions when there can be a conflict between the two issues they run on, but maybe that would be good for another blog.